Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

The main purpose of the so-called "sanctions" of the United States is not the Russian Federation.
This is the US trade war against Europe. The goal is Europe.
It is very strange for me to see how numerous experts only talk about some kind of “sanctions” in response to Russia against the United States. Gentlemen, what are you talking about? Wake up already.
Brothers beat the merchant and extort money from him. What kind of side are you here? Yes, you have some business with this merchant, and they are standing until they mutuet. Yes, a merchant is formally charged precisely for working with you. But this is only a reason, not a reason. They just want money from him. His money, not yours. How can you answer if you are not even asked to do anything?
Amazing near.
During the US trade war against Europe, what happened? EU-Russia trade decreased by 300 billion a year. And the US-Russia trade even grew. Direct extortion in favor of the USA from European corporations has been put into practice. A new package codifies this practice and puts it on stream. Who suffered the most? - Europe.
The same is not hidden in the x-files. It is in front of everyone.But for some reason almost all of them continue to call the obvious open trade war against Europe “anti-Russian sanctions.”
And how did it happen that the American-occupied Japan and South Korea were not forced to sever economic relations with Russia? It would not be so difficult. But for some reason such “sanctions” were not required. And multibillion-dollar sales of Russian weapons around the world? Suppose that you cannot click on China and India. And on all other buyers - really. But even Iraq is allowed to buy Russian weapons. It would seem that a strike against the military-industrial complex by prohibiting exports would be the most effective against the “aggressor”. But no. Nothing like that.
Everything is just about Europe. There are no "anti-Russian sanctions" to be seen. One war with Europe.
There is no practical sense for the United States to crush the Russian economy. It is not a competitor for the USA, even as the market is not particularly interesting. Europe is another matter. 750 million qualitative population, aggregate GDP, industry - more and more than in America. Is it dangerous. And it is nutritious.
And in this war a new strategic offensive begins.Let's look at the options for the development of events. There are exactly two of them.
1. Americans put Europe on their knees and impose a new heavy tribute (energy, increased spending on weapons, etc.). Double effect: robbery and reduction of the potential of the enemy.
2. Americans quarrel with Europe. Then customs barriers will rise on both sides. The US will begin to reduce the negative trade balance with Europe. That is, the flow of manufactured goods in the United States will be reduced in exchange for paper. The United States will begin import substitution and re-industrialization on the resource of domestic demand. For the EU, the American market is a third of exports. The reduction will hit production, the purchasing power of other markets is lower, it will not be possible to completely redirect the flow of goods. Theoretically, American products in new conditions should be cheaper - in Europe, higher costs due to higher social guarantees. And the balance within even one EU is lower than in the United States. And the young Europeans will help create problems for Old Europe, right up to the wars.
It is conditionally possible to consider the first version of the goal of globalists with the candidate Hillary,and the second is the goal of the American country elite with candidate Trump. Europe must attack both groups. An attack in just such a form can serve both.
And you were surprised at the unanimous vote in Congress and in the Senate? And what do you think about what were the coordination of the bill between the parties? If we assume that the bill is “anti-Russian sanctions”, then we must recognize the existence of the true pro-Russian party and numerous agents of Putin in that helminth. And if we assume that each group tried to direct an attack on Europe to its own advantage, then everything falls into place.
And what should Russia do here? Introduce anti-sanctions against the United States? A pack of jackals fighting with a pack of hyenas for the right to devour a buffalo. Are we going to throw stones at clouds of dust that hide the battle? What for?
And by the way, the buffalo also has an opinion. That is, a buffalo on one side only. In fact, inside him, too, their jackals are fighting with their hyenas.
Russia, as always, faces a difficult choice. At first glance, it is advantageous to separate Europe from the United States on the second option. But Russia risks becoming dependent on the EU already - they are much more economically strong,and the European problems arising in the process of divorce will require aggressive solutions, for example, at our expense. Europe that is chronizing before the world hegemon can try to snatch a little sovereignty with the help of Russia, using some of its resources on a mutually beneficial basis. Russia for Europe sometimes becomes a situational ally.
Breaking the chain of Europe will enter the arena to seriously fight. Who will Russia be for her then? Still a situational ally, a strategic ally, or a direction for aggression?
The best option for Russia would be to cause serious mutual damage for both those fighting across the Atlantic.
The less they will then be able to show when the smoke clears. But we also have to stay on our own, from there it flies regularly. And so that it does not turn out that the bleeding opponents then easily overwhelm China and begin to dictate its own rules.
Russia should choose its strategy, its tactics. And go through the razor's edge. Whatever is chosen, there are two possible actions: passive observation and survival or active intervention.
Russia can not prevent America and Europe to deal with each other.There is not the slightest sense to attack America, and there are no real opportunities either. Europe should be attacked. No, do not try to attack the buffalo too, it is not under force. It is necessary, choosing your own route, beat the hyenas, help the jackals, then beat the jackals, help the hyenas. Both internal and external. Difficult game. And the fog of war, let loose by propaganda, will always hide the true objectives.
Therefore, the response (real, not imitative) of the Russian Federation to "American sanctions" will be directed against Europe, and not against the United States.

Related news

  • Surveyor - ear with an eye in the port
  • TOP-7 summer dishes - the best recipes for every day
  • Electronic libraries on various topics: a selection of sites
  • The oldest surviving bottle of wine in the world
  • TOP-6 refreshing homemade lemonade. Saving ourselves from the heat

  • Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe

    Russia will respond to America with a blow to Europe